Skip to content

bench: add zone map pruning benchmark - #9439

Merged
robert3005 merged 4 commits into
developfrom
rk/zone-map-prune-bench
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

bench: add zone map pruning benchmark#9439
robert3005 merged 4 commits into
developfrom
rk/zone-map-prune-bench

Conversation

@robert3005

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Measures ZoneMap::prune end-to-end for the overhead beyond expression
rewriting

Signed-off-by: Robert Kruszewski robert@spiraldb.com

@robert3005 robert3005 added the changelog/chore A trivial change label Aug 17, 2026
Measures `ZoneMap::prune` end-to-end for the overhead beyond expression
rewriting

Signed-off-by: Robert Kruszewski <robert@spiraldb.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Kruszewski <github@robertk.io>
@robert3005
robert3005 force-pushed the rk/zone-map-prune-bench branch from 2596b59 to 457d57b Compare August 17, 2026 10:04
@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 10.98%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2041 untouched benchmarks
🆕 15 new benchmarks
⏩ 46 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation compress_fsst[(1000, 64, 8)] 1 ms 1.2 ms -11.38%
Simulation compress_fsst[(10000, 64, 4)] 8.6 ms 9.7 ms -10.58%
🆕 Simulation float_gt[1024] N/A 326.4 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation float_gt[16] N/A 295 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation int_gt[1024] N/A 124.4 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation int_gt[16] N/A 115.9 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation is_not_null_pred[1024] N/A 248.9 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation is_not_null_pred[16] N/A 231.9 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation missing_stats[1024] N/A 91.6 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation missing_stats[16] N/A 89.8 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation or_chain[1024] N/A 1.6 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation or_chain[16] N/A 1.5 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation float_gt[8192] N/A 521.9 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation int_gt[8192] N/A 166.6 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation is_not_null_pred[8192] N/A 493 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation missing_stats[8192] N/A 91.4 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation or_chain[8192] N/A 2.3 ms N/A

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing rk/zone-map-prune-bench (802ceb7) with develop (d0f29f8)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 46 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

Signed-off-by: Robert Kruszewski <github@robertk.io>
@robert3005
robert3005 force-pushed the rk/zone-map-prune-bench branch from e8235b1 to 97c6412 Compare August 17, 2026 18:10
Comment thread vortex-layout/benches/zone_map_prune.rs Outdated
Signed-off-by: Robert Kruszewski <github@robertk.io>
@robert3005
robert3005 merged commit 43a2099 into develop Aug 19, 2026
95 of 98 checks passed
@robert3005
robert3005 deleted the rk/zone-map-prune-bench branch August 19, 2026 10:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/chore A trivial change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants