Rename the precondition helpers to short_circuit - #9406
Performance Regression: -5.65%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 4 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1995 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 89 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | cold_misaligned[(64, 256)] |
4.4 ms | 5.3 ms | -17.08% |
| ❌ | WallTime | words_gather_scalar[65536] |
8.2 µs | 9.4 µs | -12.13% |
| ❌ | WallTime | words_gather_dispatch[1024] |
8 ns | 9 ns | -11.11% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compress_fsst[(1000, 64, 8)] |
1 ms | 1.1 ms | -10.92% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | decompress[u64, (10000, 4)] |
402.6 µs | 310.6 µs | +29.6% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ct/rename-precondition-short-circuit (7a567cb) with develop (b825c4f)
Footnotes
-
89 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩