fix(cli): use cobra mutual-exclusivity template in sso add by Coly010 · Pull Request #5974 · supabase/cli

Coly010 · 2026-07-28T13:50:03Z

What changed

sso add emitted a hand-written mutual-exclusivity error (only one of --metadata-file or --metadata-url may be set) and detected the conflict via Option.isSome on parsed flag values. The Go CLI enforces this group via cobra's MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive("metadata-file", "metadata-url") (apps/cli-go/cmd/sso.go:164), whose error template is:

if any flags in the group [metadata-file metadata-url] are set none of the others can be; [metadata-file metadata-url] were all set

sso update was already migrated to the shared cobraMutuallyExclusiveErrorMessage helper plus raw-argv pflag.Changed-semantics detection (CLI-1902); add was never migrated. This PR mirrors update's pattern in add.handler.ts:

Byte-exact cobra template via cobraMutuallyExclusiveErrorMessage (group in Go's registration order; the violating subset sorted, per cobra's validateExclusiveFlagGroups).
hasExplicitValueFlag raw-argv scan, so an explicit empty value (--metadata-file= --metadata-url x) still trips the mutex, while a bare --metadata-file --metadata-url (pflag consuming the second token as the first flag's value) correctly does not.
The check runs before project-ref resolution, matching cobra's ValidateFlagGroups-before-RunE precedence.

Integration tests cover the exact-message case (byte-match), the explicit-empty --metadata-file= case, the consumed-value non-violation case, and single-flag happy paths. SIDE_EFFECTS.md now documents the cobra template and Changed semantics.

Review findings deliberately left open

A four-perspective review pass (architect / engineer / security / DX) approved the change; these pre-existing, cross-cutting observations were noted rather than fixed here:

The mutex filter/fail orchestration is now duplicated between sso add and sso update — a family-root helper (e.g. sso.mutex.ts) is a reasonable follow-up.
SSO_ADD_VALUE_FLAG_NAMES (like update's equivalent) is a hand-maintained mirror of the command's declared value flags with no compile-time sync guarantee.
Telemetry flushes on a mutex violation, whereas Go's cobra fails flag-group validation before telemetry is installed — pre-existing divergence shared with sso update.
The raw-argv scan doesn't understand global/inherited value flags or the -t shorthand — documented limitation shared with sso update; pflag fails -t's enum validation before flag groups anyway.
The --domains= explicit-empty edge on add (parity audit §3.10) is a separate issue and is not addressed here.

Fixes CLI-1982

https://linear.app/supabase/issue/CLI-1982/sso-add-mutual-exclusivity-error-is-not-cobra-format

Coly010 · 2026-07-28T13:50:13Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bb94ec7ee8

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

…(review: PR #5974) The raw-argv mutex scan and the Effect parser could disagree on which flags pflag would consider set: pflag consumes flag-shaped tokens as values unconditionally, the Effect parser does not. The scan matched pflag for the mutex check, but the handler then acted on the parsed Options — so 'sso add --type saml --project-ref --metadata-file x.xml --metadata-url u' suppressed the mutex yet read the metadata file and POSTed metadata_xml, an API call the Go CLI never makes (Go fails AssertProjectRefIsValid on the consumed value '--metadata-file' in PersistentPreRunE, cmd/root.go:113, before ValidateFlagGroups). Replace the per-flag hasExplicitValueFlag scan with a single pflag-faithful pflagLongFlagOccurrences pass that also yields each flag's effective value(s), and reconcile everything both sso handlers act on (project-ref, metadata-file, metadata-url, attribute-mapping-file, the domain slices, and set-ness of name-id-format/skip-url-validation) to those values. sso update shares the same gap and gets the same fix.

Coly010 · 2026-07-29T10:35:23Z

🤖 pr-autopilot needs a human here: this branch now conflicts with develop in apps/cli/src/legacy/commands/sso/update/update.handler.ts. The conflict is between this PR's pflag value-reconciliation in sso update (820f0e7, added while addressing the Codex review) and #5973 (CLI-1981, 5cd669cd — "always send domains in sso update PUT body"), which landed on develop during this run and changed the same domains body block. Both changes are wanted; the merge needs a human to combine the reconciled domains/addDomains/removeDomains values with CLI-1981's always-send-domains body shape. Per policy I don't auto-resolve conflicts, so I'm stopping here — everything else on this PR is done (CI was green on the previous head, and the one open review thread is addressed and resolved).

…2-sso-add-mutual-exclusivity-error-is-not-cobra-format # Conflicts: # apps/cli/src/legacy/commands/sso/update/update.handler.ts

Coly010 · 2026-07-29T10:45:15Z

Merged origin/develop (887811b). The one conflict was the domains block in update.handler.ts, resolved by combining both parity fixes: #5973's unconditional always-send-domains control flow (the else branch always recomputes and sends domains, CLI-1981) wins, but it now consumes this branch's pflag-reconciled domains/addDomains/removeDomains instead of the raw parsed flags (CLI-1982). mergeDomains' relaxed seed filter from #5973 is preserved, and the two behaviours compose cleanly — e.g. --domains= reconciles to an empty slice via the pflag scan and still falls into the merge branch, exactly as #5973's test pins. Both test suites pass unmodified: all sso add/update files (112 tests), full test:core, and check:all are green.

Coly010 · 2026-07-29T10:51:19Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 887811b4e1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

…ective argv in sso (review: PR #5974) The pflag reconciliation kept handlers from acting on values pflag never set, but two cobra validations that run before RunE were still invisible to it (Codex review on 887811b): - 'sso add --domains --type saml': pflag hands --type to --domains, so Go fails ValidateRequiredFlags (command.go:1007, required "type" per cmd/sso.go:165) and never POSTs — the TS handler POSTed with domains ["--type"]. - 'sso update --domains --metadata-url u <id>': the consumed token orphans u into the positionals, so Go fails ValidateArgs/ExactArgs(1) (command.go:968, cmd/sso.go:87) before any hook — the TS handler performed the GET and PUT. Evolve the raw-argv scan (pflagLongFlagOccurrences -> pflagArgvScan) into a fuller pflag walk over the closed set of flags the parser can let through: root persistent value flags (cmd/root.go:324-333, incl. the TS-only --output-format), value shorthands (-t/-o per parseSingleShortArg, flag.go:1080-1094), pflag-effective positionals, and consumed long-flag tracking. sso add emulates the required-type check ahead of the mutex block (required beats groups); sso update emulates ExactArgs(1) ahead of the mutex and UUID checks (arity beats both) — binary-verified orderings. Naive per-thread fixes would have regressed '-t saml' and '-o json <id>' / '--workdir . <id>'; the update test that expected ref validation for '--project-ref --metadata-file x.xml ...' now expects the arity error Go actually raises there (x.xml is positional to pflag).

Coly010 · 2026-07-29T12:04:56Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 25df67c562

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

…es, and interspersed flags (review: PR #5974) Three narrow gaps in the pflag-faithful argv scan, all binary-verified against apps/cli-go (Codex review round 3 on 25df67c): - 'sso add --domains -t saml': pflag hands the -t token to --domains, so type is never Changed and Go fails ValidateRequiredFlags — the TS handler POSTed type "saml" with domains ["-t"]. The scan's consumed-token tracking now maps shorthand tokens (-t, -t=saml, -tsaml) to their canonical long names (consumedLongFlagNames -> consumedFlagNames). - 'sso update <id> --domains': pflag fails ParseFlags (cobra command.go:919) with 'flag needs an argument: --domains' (pflag errors.go:75,78 for the 't' in -t shorthand form) before ValidateArgs, every hook, and RunE — the TS handlers performed the GET and PUT / the POST. The scan now reports missingValueError instead of inventing an empty occurrence, and both handlers reject it first (parse beats arity: 'sso update a b --domains' names the missing argument, not the arg count). - 'sso --profile foo update --domains --metadata-url u <id>': cobra's Find/stripFlags routes through persistent flags between path segments and Go still raises 'accepts 1 arg(s), received 2', but the contiguous anchor failed and the TS handler skipped the arity re-count and proceeded. Anchoring now walks argv matching segments while stepping over flag tokens and their consumed values. (The reviewer's original '--project-ref' example cannot reach the handler — the Effect parser rejects leaf flags at the group level — but root globals like --profile/-o reproduce it.) Known shared residual, unchanged from the round-2 arity emulation: Go prints a usage block for errors raised before PersistentPreRunE sets SilenceUsage (cmd/root.go:97), i.e. parse and arity errors; the TS handler-level emulations render the single error line + --debug suggestion only.

Coly010 · 2026-07-29T13:29:40Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-07-29T13:36:01Z

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Bravo.

Reviewed commit: e2de9121e1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

github-actions · 2026-07-29T13:47:42Z

Supabase CLI preview

npx --yes https://pkg.pr.new/supabase/cli/supabase@7e21b4aafc0074da0f01686db59df09215fac522

Preview package for commit 7e21b4a.

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e2de9121e1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

…tics in sso (review: PR #5974) The round-2 value reconciliation covered sso's string and slice flags but left --skip-url-validation, --name-id-format, and --type on the Effect- parsed values gated on set-ness. Those values can disagree with pflag in two ways, both binary-verified against apps/cli-go (Codex review round 4 on e2de912): - Repeated flags: the Effect parser resolves first-wins, pflag Sets every occurrence so the last wins. 'sso update <id> --skip-url-validation --skip-url-validation=false --metadata-url http://x' skips URL validation in TS but validates (and rejects non-HTTPS) in Go; the mirror argv diverges the other way, and '--domains' consuming one of two --name-id-format occurrences flips which URN lands in the PUT body. - Set-rejected values: pflag aborts ParseFlags on any occurrence its Value.Set rejects, before every hook, validation, and request. The Effect parser accepts yes/no booleans (strconv.ParseBool does not) and never validates the repeats it discards, so '--type saml --type bogus' and '--skip-url-validation=yes' reached the handlers and called the API where Go exits 1 with 'invalid argument ...'. The scan already records every non-consumed occurrence with its raw value, so the fix stays at the established handler-emulation level: two new helpers in sso.pflag-reconcile.ts re-run pflag's per-occurrence Set over the scan output (ParseBool set; enum membership; byte-exact pflag error messages incl. the '-t, --type' shorthand label) and yield the last-occurrence effective values the handlers now act on. Checks sit ahead of the missing-value emulation, matching pflag's sequential walk (an occurrence always precedes a trailing bare flag; binary-verified '--skip-url-validation=yes --domains' names the invalid argument). The shared NAME_ID_FORMATS list is hoisted to sso.saml.ts per the family-root rule. Known residuals unchanged: parse errors raised before Go sets SilenceUsage print cobra's usage block in Go only, and boolean literals ParseBool accepts but the Effect parser rejects (t/T/TRUE/...) still fail at the TS parse layer with the parser's own error.

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 07b145b174

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

…2-sso-add-mutual-exclusivity-error-is-not-cobra-format

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 7e21b4aafc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-07-30T10:01:29Z

+    if (raw === "") {
+      effective = true;
+      continue;


Distinguish bare booleans from inline empty values

When a valid first occurrence is followed by --skip-url-validation= (for example, --skip-url-validation=false --skip-url-validation=), Effect's first-wins parsing lets the handler run, but pflag calls strconv.ParseBool("") for the second occurrence and exits before any request. pflagArgvScan represents both a bare flag and an inline-empty value as "", so this branch incorrectly treats the latter as NoOptDefVal=true, allowing add/update to issue POST or GET/PUT requests instead of returning the invalid-argument error. Fresh evidence beyond the earlier boolean-reconciliation comment is this still-unhandled collision for a later inline-empty occurrence; preserve whether the occurrence used = so only the bare form maps to true.

AGENTS.md reference: apps/cli/AGENTS.md:L248-L256

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

fix(cli): use cobra mutual-exclusivity template in sso add (CLI-1982)

bb94ec7

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jul 28, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread apps/cli/src/legacy/commands/sso/add/add.handler.ts Outdated

Coly010 mentioned this pull request Jul 28, 2026

fix(cli): edge and cosmetic parity sweep from the 2026-07-24 audit (CLI-1990) #5978

Open

Coly010 self-assigned this Jul 29, 2026

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/develop' into columferry/cli-198…

887811b

…2-sso-add-mutual-exclusivity-error-is-not-cobra-format # Conflicts: # apps/cli/src/legacy/commands/sso/update/update.handler.ts

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jul 29, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread apps/cli/src/legacy/commands/sso/add/add.handler.ts

Comment thread apps/cli/src/legacy/commands/sso/update/update.handler.ts Outdated

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jul 29, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread apps/cli/src/shared/cli/cobra-flag-groups.ts

Comment thread apps/cli/src/shared/cli/cobra-flag-groups.ts Outdated

Comment thread apps/cli/src/shared/cli/cobra-flag-groups.ts Outdated

Coly010 marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2026 13:40

Coly010 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 29, 2026 13:40

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jul 29, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread apps/cli/src/legacy/commands/sso/update/update.handler.ts Outdated

Comment thread apps/cli/src/legacy/commands/sso/update/update.handler.ts

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jul 29, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread apps/cli/src/legacy/commands/sso/sso.pflag-reconcile.ts

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/develop' into columferry/cli-198…

7e21b4a

…2-sso-add-mutual-exclusivity-error-is-not-cobra-format

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jul 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Conversation

Coly010 commented Jul 28, 2026

What changed

Review findings deliberately left open

Uh oh!

Coly010 commented Jul 28, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Coly010 commented Jul 29, 2026

Uh oh!

Coly010 commented Jul 29, 2026

Uh oh!

Coly010 commented Jul 29, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Coly010 commented Jul 29, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Coly010 commented Jul 29, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jul 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Supabase CLI preview

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot Jul 30, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

github-actions Bot commented Jul 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading