Repository navigation
Start a live stream at the next block when the start block number is missing - #83
Merged
sduchesneau merged 2 commits intoOct 9, 2026
Conversation
…missing Fixes streamingfast#82 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
|
@YaroShkvorets ok I merged this too quickly, it introduces a bug.. fix incoming 😅 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #82.
blocksFromNummatched the start block exactly, so a start on a missed slot found nothing in the hub and waited for the merged bundle. It now starts at the first block at or after the start, as the file source andblocksFromNumWithForksalready do.🤖 Generated with Claude Code