Conversation
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR serves as a complement to PR #162854 by adding safety docs for the remaining atomic operations. These operations pass raw pointers as arguments and are marked unsafe, so I think it is necessary to explain why they are unsafe.
For
atomic_cxchg,atomic_cxchgweak,atomic_xchg, these APIs have the same process whetherTis an integer or a pointer type.For
atomic_xadd,atomic_xsub,atomic_and,atomic_or,atomic_xor, these APIs correspond to different operations incore/src/sync/atomic.rsforTis an integer or a pointer type.For
atomic_max,atomic_min,atomic_umax,atomic_umin, they only process whenTis an integer (signed or unsigned) type.For
atomic_nand, there doesn't exist a method inAtomicPtr<T>, so I don't link the related method.