Skip to content

OSDOCS#19836: Docs for KDO 5.4.0#112830

Merged
ShaunaDiaz merged 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
bergerhoffer:OSDOCS-19836
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

OSDOCS#19836: Docs for KDO 5.4.0#112830
ShaunaDiaz merged 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
bergerhoffer:OSDOCS-19836

Conversation

@bergerhoffer

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Version(s):
4.22

Issue:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OSDOCS-19836

Link to docs preview:
https://112830--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/descheduler/nodes-descheduler-release-notes.html#descheduler-operator-release-notes-5.4.0_nodes-descheduler-release-notes

QE review:
Review provided by SME

Additional information:
Advisory link won't be live until the release day, currently scheduled for June 10

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer added this to the Continuous Release milestone Jun 4, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 4, 2026
Comment thread modules/nodes-descheduler-rn-5.4.0.adoc Outdated
@bergerhoffer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ingvagabund Can you please review the RNs for KDO 5.4.0? This is just mentioning the CVE fixes and kube bump.

The advisory link won't work til I updated it on release day.

Preview: https://112830--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/descheduler/nodes-descheduler-release-notes.html#descheduler-operator-release-notes-5.4.0_nodes-descheduler-release-notes

@ingvagabund

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

@jeana-redhat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The branch/enterprise-5.0 label has been added to this PR.

This is because your PR targets the main branch and is labeled for branch/enterprise-4.22. And any PR going into main must also target the latest version branch (branch/enterprise-5.0).

If the update in your PR does NOT apply to version 5.0 onward, please re-target this PR to go directly into the appropriate enterprise- version branch or branches instead of main.

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer marked this pull request as draft June 8, 2026 19:21
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 8, 2026
@bergerhoffer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

Looking for merge review before release day (review all except advisory link, which won't work yet). Put it in draft state to prevent accidental merge

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Jun 8, 2026
@dfitzmau dfitzmau added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR labels Jun 9, 2026
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer marked this pull request as ready for review June 10, 2026 12:27
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 10, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bergerhoffer: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz removed the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Jun 10, 2026

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz merged commit d660a5d into openshift:main Jun 10, 2026
2 checks passed
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 10, 2026
@ShaunaDiaz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.22

@ShaunaDiaz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-5.0

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #113076

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.22

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #113077

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-5.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.22 branch/enterprise-5.0 lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants