[PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 os-zhuang · 第 35 场 session_01VYToj6PQehTEKNrjGM9akg · 开轮 2026-10-06T14:15Z · 第 31–34 场台账在评论 #12708

Activity

1. os-litant

   self-assigned this

   on Aug 27, 2026
2. os-litant

   added

   pm:seatPM seat registry issue - single-writer body, index = this labelPM seat registry issue - single-writer body, index = this label

   on Aug 27, 2026
3. hotlong commented on Aug 30, 2026

   

   hotlong

   on Aug 30, 2026

   Contributor

   More actions

   Seat takeover audit: session local_c32e5a25-0581-4665-952f-60c1be74b250 assumes the director seat for session 4 (maintainer summon in-session: "处理 needs contract reviews", 2026-08-30T04:5xZ). Fuse machine-read: claude-fable-5 = CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER. Scope this session: needs:contract-review backstop over the 6 objectstack draft PRs + paired cards; objectui #6121/#6124 excluded (fresh triage-queue cards, no reviewable increment; triage timed round owns them). Prior seat (os-litant, session 3) closed its adjudication run 2026-08-29; its in-flight items are carried in the ledger.
4. zhuangjianguo commented on Aug 30, 2026

   

   zhuangjianguo

   on Aug 30, 2026 – with Claude

   Collaborator

   More actions

   Round-start marker — director seat, summon #5.
   Session: session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m
   Fire: 2026-08-30T10:45Z, maintainer summon via /pm-dispatch director ("总监处理决策卡").
   Predecessor's close-out briefing (2026-08-30T10:06Z, "收班") stands — seat explicitly released; explicit maintainer summon arbitrates, seat taken.
   Tier fuse (machine-read): get_session → last_served_model = claude-fable-5 = CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER → all four duties active this summon.
   Scope: decision inbox (objectstack 24 + objectui 12 open needs-user-decision cards), pm:awaiting-maintainer ledger (10), governed-merge audit window from the recorded anchor. needs:contract-review carrier #12009 is left to the triage timed round per the anti-double-run fence (backstop only if found stalled).

   ---

   Generated by Claude Code
5. zhuangjianguo

   changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 os-litant (session_016SG9S6V15MqeAgkehDcTwk) · 第 3 场决裁毕(58 张,双仓清零) · 在飞:2 PR + 1 dev[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场决裁中(决策箱 36:os 24 + ui 12)[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
6. zhuangjianguo

   changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场决裁中(决策箱 36:os 24 + ui 12)[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 一类自裁 6 毕 · 呈裁批 #1/6 已呈(决策箱余 30)[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
7. zhuangjianguo

   changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 一类自裁 6 毕 · 呈裁批 #1/6 已呈(决策箱余 30)[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 11 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1 裁 5)· 决策箱余 25 · 呈裁批 #2 拟[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
8. zhuangjianguo

   changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 11 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1 裁 5)· 决策箱余 25 · 呈裁批 #2 拟[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 16 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1/#2 裁 10)· 决策箱余 20[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
9. zhuangjianguo

   changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 16 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1/#2 裁 10)· 决策箱余 20[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 21 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1–#3 裁 15)· 决策箱余 15[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
10. zhuangjianguo

    changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 21 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1–#3 裁 15)· 决策箱余 15[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 26 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1–#4 裁 20)· 决策箱余 10[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
11. zhuangjianguo

    changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 26 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1–#4 裁 20)· 决策箱余 10[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 31 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1–#5 裁 25)· 决策箱余 5(末批呈)[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
12. zhuangjianguo

    changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 31 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1–#5 裁 25)· 决策箱余 5(末批呈)[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 决策箱清零(自裁 7 + 批 #1–#9 裁 40)· 复审链 5 PASS + 1 FAIL 交接[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
13. zhuangjianguo

    changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 决策箱清零(自裁 7 + 批 #1–#9 裁 40)· 复审链 5 PASS + 1 FAIL 交接[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 决策箱清零(自裁 7 + 批 #1–#9 裁 44)· 复审 6 PASS 全 MERGED · 直派 3 PR 全 MERGED[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
14. zhuangjianguo

    changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 决策箱清零(自裁 7 + 批 #1–#9 裁 44)· 复审 6 PASS 全 MERGED · 直派 3 PR 全 MERGED[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5-6 场 · 批 #1–#10 裁 49 + 自裁 7 · 复审 8 PASS · 批 #11 已呈[/+] on Aug 31, 2026
15. zhuangjianguo

    changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5-6 场 · 批 #1–#10 裁 49 + 自裁 7 · 复审 8 PASS · 批 #11 已呈[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5-6 场 · 批 #1–#11 裁 50 + 自裁 7 · 批 #11 余四张维护者自留[/+] on Aug 31, 2026
16. 652 remaining items

    Load more

    Load more actions

17. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 10, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 10, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #35 ledger (block AO · the inline-edit default: assessment, the maintainer's 乙 ruling, the cards; #22601 taken out of this seat's duty) — director seat, session_01VYToj6PQehTEKNrjGM9akg, 2026-10-10T04:10Z. Every write went through the relay and was read back, except the one named below that could not be. Opening marker: 6018228844; blocks A 6018427337, B 6019459435, C 6020392255, D 6028028408, E 6028910771, F 6030305608, G 6030383294, H 6049606453, I 6049791391, J 6050573397, K 6050878414, L 6051333637, M 6051522691, N 6051683577, O 6051902367, P 6052267931, Q 6052922461, R 6053258206, S 6053917861, T 6054177312, U 6054919089, V 6056664185, W 6056925667, X 6057840414, Y 6063360973, Z 6070849023, AA 6071014690, AB 6073542013, AC 6073944666, AD 6074095086, AE 6074908165, AF 6074984398, AG 6078280852, AH 6079678073, AI 6079845435, AJ 6081201019, AK 6082666937, AL 6091572672, AM 6092715733, AN 6093499537.

    • objectstack#22601 (ADR-0131's remaining stages) is not this seat's to present or rule. Presented as batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #309 after block AN; the maintainer answered, verbatim, 「22601 不需要你决裁」 and then 「22601 不处理的意思是标记也不需要」. No comment, label or body write on the card; it stays needs-user-decision for the maintainer's own ruling, and this seat does not re-present it.
    • The maintainer's question on the inline-edit gate (objectui PR @objectstack/spec/cloud declares camelCase rows but the /api/v1/cloud/* control plane speaks snake_case — the cloud contracts are not the wire types, so 15 client methods cannot be bound to them #12036, objectui#5144: a grid view declaring neither userActions.editInline nor inlineEdit offers no inline-edit toggle; HotCRM's tables and AI-built tables lose cell editing). Assessment from source: the spec has declared .default(false) since 17.0 (view.zod.ts:1535); the console enforced it from 2026-10-09 under the maintainer's own 2026-08-18 B-fold ruling; the permission gate (ListView.tsx:2007) sits under the author key; HotCRM main f0afcbd has 40 grid and 1 list views in 14 files with 0 declarations; objectstack's examples 18 files with at most 2; the UI skill and the CLI scaffold teach nothing about the key. Mainstream splits: CRM and record-list products on by default under permissions with an admin switch (Salesforce, ServiceNow, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho); metadata app builders opt-in per view (Odoo, Power Apps, APEX, AppSheet, Retool). Three routes offered: 甲 keep the default and declare the key on every view; 乙 flip the spec default to true in v18 with editInline: false as the opt-out; 丙 an app-level default. Recommended 乙.
    • First instruction, 「只需要处理已经交代的 userActions.editInline: true」, read as 甲 and executed: views: declare userActions.editInline: true on every grid and list view, so cell editing survives the objectui upgrade (objectstack-ai/objectui#5144) hotcrm#2048 created through relay run 38022648759 (conclusion success; pm:queue, priority:p2) and objectstack#22604 created (pm:queue). ⚠️ hotcrm#2048 could not be read back from this session: the hotcrm API and page answer 403 here, the relay run's log download is blocked by the proxy, and attaching the repository with credentials was denied by the permission classifier. No further write went to hotcrm.
    • Second instruction, the ruling, verbatim 「乙 v18 把 spec 默认翻成 true,editInline: false 变成关法。」, executed:
      • spec: ListView.userActions.editInline defaults to true in v18 and editInline: false is the opt-out; objectui reads an absent key as on (maintainer ruling 2026-10-10, after objectui#5144) #22605 filed (pm:queue, target:v18): the spec default flips to true in v18 and editInline: false is the opt-out; the B-fold and the permission gate stand; the consumer half for objectui (absent key read as on in inlineEditOffered and InterfaceListPage, pins flipped, the ADR-0047 page gains the toggle) is filed by the claiming seat; the UI skill's one paragraph rides the spec PR (Tier H, the maintainer's APPROVED). Not taken: 甲 and 丙.
      • ui skill, CLI view scaffold and examples: a business object's grid view declares userActions.editInline: true, so AI-built and scaffolded tables keep cell editing under the spec default (objectui#5144) #22604 closed not_planned as superseded (6093607866, through close-cards).
      • objectui#5144 carries a record of the default's change pointing at spec: ListView.userActions.editInline defaults to true in v18 and editInline: false is the opt-out; objectui reads an absent key as on (maintainer ruling 2026-10-10, after objectui#5144) #22605 (6093615313); the closed card is otherwise untouched.
      • hotcrm#2048 is superseded but still open, for the reason above: the maintainer, or the hotcrm lane seat, closes it as superseded by objectstack#22605, or allows this session to attach the repository.
    • Decision box after this act (read at 2026-10-10T04:10Z): objectstack#22601 (the maintainer's own, per the words above); objectui and cloud boxes empty.
    • Still the maintainer's acts: hotcrm#2048 (above); PR chore(governance): the human-merge line threshold is 3,000 changed lines (HUMAN_MERGE_LINE_THRESHOLD), per the maintainer's 2026-10-09 ruling #22490 (the 3,000-line threshold), PR docs(skills): objectstack-automation teaches the {{ }} delimiter in flow text slots #22475, PR feat(formula): isoDate(t) / isoDatetime(t), the string form of a CEL timestamp #22347 and PR fix(spec): the submitBehavior property help carries no ruling date #22322 (Tier H approvals); the pm:awaiting-maintainer roster (objectstack mcp distribution: verify the remote MCP + OAuth surface against ChatGPT connectors and Codex CLI, and submit the metadata-only registry listings — the remainder of #2714 #20791; cloud 14); the cloud#2680 production read-only check; the coverage sweep trigger; the fix(plugin-email): a metadata-door email template edit survives the next boot #21818 revision purge; the OS_FLEET_PRIVATE_KEY rotation. PR feat(spec)!: PROTOCOL_VERSION 17 → 18 in an ordinary PR — regenerated spec-changes.json and upgrade guide, ^18 handshakes, pre-mode lockstep exception (#22085 Q1 → B) #22215 is approved and waits on CI and the queue.
    • Writes this block: 3 cards created (hotcrm#2048 unverified, ui skill, CLI view scaffold and examples: a business object's grid view declares userActions.editInline: true, so AI-built and scaffolded tables keep cell editing under the spec default (objectui#5144) #22604, spec: ListView.userActions.editInline defaults to true in v18 and editInline: false is the opt-out; objectui reads an absent key as on (maintainer ruling 2026-10-10, after objectui#5144) #22605), 1 close with its comment, 1 record comment, this comment — all objectstack-fleet[bot]. No dev dispatched; no code written.
18. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 10, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 10, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #36 ledger (block A · batch #309 presented and ruled) — director seat, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH, 2026-10-10T05:11Z. Every write went through the relay and was read back. Opening marker: 6093572306.

    • Batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #309 (one card, presented on the maintainer's 「先处理 22601」) and the maintainer's answer, verbatim 「同意」: objectstack#22601 (p1, domain:services, area:access, target:v18; the remaining ADR-0131 path: C2's last four stages and C3) → B, one cutover; sub-question Q → (a) (6094045326). C2's reader switch (S8a, S8b, S9) and C3 land as one batch of PRs in a short window, each green and leaving main usable, with no transition piece (no position projector, no metadata-first dual write, no row fallback read, no junction id bridge); S5c proceeds now; under single a position name is unique per deployment, a second holder is refused at the write door and an existing pair is reported as conflicting by the migration (Q4 A's consequence). A (stage by stage, with transition pieces C3 then deletes) and C (the four objects kept as registry-backed virtual objects: a new generic mechanism and a D2/D3/D7/D13 revision) not taken. The seat's own readings corrected two card figures: objectui has at least 10 source files reading the four tables plus the generic Setup pages, where the card said 6 (that is C9, objectui#7611); and A needs no ADR change, while B needs one §8/D14 execution-plan note (Tier H). → closed completed, needs-user-decision removed with the close (close-cards, one write); the body's Ruled: line added and the filing-time ⛔ line struck (10,549 bytes read back identical). Pointers: feat(core,objectql,plugin-security,plugin-sharing): the catalog is read from the registry; assignment tables reference it by name (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D4) #15196 6094068900 (S5c stays pm:queue; S8a, S8b and S9 fold into the cutover), refactor(plugin-security,platform-objects,spec): retire the catalog seeders, the per-organization catalog machinery and the four catalog objects; Setup creation is an environment write under single and refused under a wall (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D5/D13) #15204 6094072651 (the cutover batch; five triage items: the DRIFTED re-verification, the stage plan, the Blocked-by: rewrite then pm:queue, the ADR §8/D14 note card, objectui#7611's scope note), triage seat post [PM seat] triage (objectstack-wide) — 🟢 Routine · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U · trig_01NcnCtMS2tH46nUg1a5TaMJ (hourly) · state = body + the round records newer than it #6015 6094076128 (the handoff). The ruling carries Thread-read:, Prior rulings read:, the 自检 line and the chosen option's workload (pm-dispatch decision framework: every decision card and every director presentation states each option's development workload (maintainer-directed) #22597's rule).
    • Decision box after this act: no card waits on a letter (objectstack, objectui and cloud issues: none); no open PR carries needs-user-decision.
    • Next in this summon, on the maintainer's second instruction, verbatim 「综合评估整个开发方案还有什么需要优化的。后续还有哪些开发内容和我具体解释」: the ADR-0131 family assessment is given in chat; it is not a ruling, and nothing is filed from it without the maintainer's word. Duty one (the governed-merge audit) and duty three (pm:awaiting-maintainer: objectstack design(v18): the complete guest model in one ADR — identity, doors, grants channel, organization, public-site binding, disclosure, rate limits, and each declared guest key's fate (ADR-0090 D9 enforce-or-remove) #22146 and mcp distribution: verify the remote MCP + OAuth surface against ChatGPT connectors and Codex CLI, and submit the metadata-only registry listings — the remainder of #2714 #20791; cloud Excel 导出支持 select/status 字段颜色(白底+选项色作字体色) #2757, refactor(spec): remove dead compliance subsystems (ADR-0056 D8) + mark agent visibility EXPERIMENTAL (#1901) #2693, [11.0][A2] Remove dead author-facing metadata properties (ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove) #2377, fix(automation): re-bind scheduled-flow jobs on os dev hot-reload #2313, chore(deps)(deps): bump the production-dependencies group with 17 updates #2158, feat(dogfood): in-process runtime regression gate #2020 and chore: version packages #786) follow in this summon's later blocks.
    • No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched by this seat.

    ---

    Generated by Claude Code
19. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 10, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 10, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #36 ledger (block B · duty one and duty three run; batch #310, the assessment items, ruled and recorded) — director seat, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH, 2026-10-10T05:27Z. Every write went through the relay and was read back. Opening marker: 6093572306; block A 6094091879.

    • Duty one, the governed-merge audit (check-governed-merges.mjs at sweep code 3e72f939, the three clones deepened by 1500 first, exit 0 on both runs). objectstack and objectui, --since-ref objectstack=6befe19c6e39 --since-ref objectui=c910630cf94c (the anchors this post's 说明 section recorded for the round): 509 mainline commits (295 and 214), 36 governed merges and 6 oversized landings with no governed path. Every entry corresponds to a merge the maintainer performed or approved, or a seat landed on its tier's record:
      • 25 merged by os-zhuang, listed for recognition: objectstack docs(adr): ADR-0087 D4 and its P2 true-up record ruling B′ — the two projections are generated at publish, not committed (#22449) #22561, tooling(pm): dispatch-gates — the hand-written tables move out as data, the self-test out as a module with fast/slow tiers, derivation byte-identical #22531 (29,479 changed lines, the dispatch-gates refactor), feat(metadata-protocol,runtime,service-automation,spec)!: the protocol refuses every organization-scoped write; an uninstall is environment-wide (ADR-0131 D6/D12) #22515 (6,496, C5 S4, approved by the same account), chore(governance): the human-merge line threshold is 3,000 changed lines (HUMAN_MERGE_LINE_THRESHOLD), per the maintainer's 2026-10-09 ruling #22490, docs(skills): objectstack-automation teaches the {{ }} delimiter in flow text slots #22475, docs(adr-0029): the OS_METADATA_WRITABLE anchor names the file that holds the one reader #22442, docs(adr): ADR-0138 D2 gains class 6, the acl public_read file download; the G2 result recorded (still Proposed) #22433, docs(skills): objectstack-query names the context the engine admits since ADR-0096 D5 #22382, feat(formula): isoDate(t) / isoDatetime(t), the string form of a CEL timestamp #22347, fix(spec): the submitBehavior property help carries no ruling date #22322, docs(skills): lint-rules table states both tiers of relationship/master-detail-required #22370, docs(adr-0048): N.3 amended — the post-hydration check judges a package's claim against the environment catalog (ruling letter A on #22307) #22366, skills(ui): pages.md Routing model teaches the doc navigation item; eval 4 expects it #22303, docs(adr): ADR-0096 D5 dated note — strict mode lands ON ahead of D2 and the telemetry gate #22298, skills(ui): the page skill learns the print page — print, the printable block subset and its lint (#22271) #22287, docs(skills): objectstack-automation teaches the CEL value envelope in fields / assignment values and / 100.0 for money #22284, docs(adr): ADR-0138 the guest model (Proposed) — doors, grants channel, organization, ownership, and every guest key's fate #22239, docs(skills): objectstack-ui action examples and the SKILL.md action rows follow the ActionSchema refinements #22184, docs(north-star): align the North Star to ontology-as-software — five edits #22179, docs(skills): objectstack-upgrade's late-arrival example starts at the support floor #22145, feat(spec)!: refuse bare unique: true on a declared index at protocol 18 — stated scope, zero-drift conversion (ADR-0120 D2/D5a/D7) #22103, docs(skills): objectstack-upgrade names os migrate meta --write beside the default run #22122, fix(spec): EvalUser.isPlatformAdmin is the ADR-0095 D3 PLATFORM_ADMIN standing, not a deprecated alias #22018, chore(pm): delete report-only check-widening-tells.mjs and its wiring (ruling 208) #22002 (6,580); objectui test(devx): sweep the shrink-only ratchet self-tests for baseline-presence pins — 33 derived, 1 repaired #12050.
      • Tier H paths landed by objectstack-fleet[bot] on an authorized APPROVED review by os-zhuang: feat(plugin-email,plugin-auth)!: close the sys_email_template organization door; retire the provenance stamp and the auth SMS seed (ADR-0131 C4, stage 1) #22087 (docs/adr, C4 stage 1), docs(adr): ADR-0048 §3.4 narrowed — positions, permission sets and capabilities hold one name per deployment #22198 (docs/adr), docs(skills): objectstack-data says what os migrate meta --from 16 does: lists the edits, --write applies the proven sites #22199 (skills), docs(north-star): priority item 4 states the human-facing standard #22205 (NORTH-STAR); the oversized feat(spec)!: PROTOCOL_VERSION 17 → 18 in an ordinary PR — regenerated spec-changes.json and upgrade guide, ^18 handshakes, pre-mode lockstep exception (#22085 Q1 → B) #22215 (8,611, PROTOCOL_VERSION 18) likewise approved. feat(spec,lint): a field declares conditionalFormatting cell rules over value and record, in the list view's own rule element #22546 (three skills/*/references/_index.md paths, no review) is the register-row case: every governed path is a spec-skill-refs generated artifact, and the Governed Surface Queue Guard answered success on the PR head ffce73a2 and on the landed commit 3d886eec0, so the queue leg lifted it byte-exact. Compliant.
      • Tier S (.claude/**) landed by the fleet bot, each with a ## Contract review PASS record on its PR thread: feat(pm/fleet-write): a workflow_dispatch op behind a closed allowlist, actions write minted for that stroke alone #22460, feat(pm): a silent claim is reclaimed by triage on a named clock through the relay (label-write --release) #22458, feat(pm): fleet-write relay carries the base sync as pr_update_branch, confirmed by measure #22457, docs(skills): checklist-author counts six sweep angles #22209, fix(spec): the retirement sentence names --write: it applies the edits it can prove, you apply the rest #22142, docs(pm-dispatch): a card that narrows a published accept set is Clause-② no, stays in its lane and owes one contract-review-tier review before the queue #22223, docs(pm-dispatch, os-dev): a user-visible UX defect is class (a) — filed like a functional one when it reproduces on a public surface with a named fix site #22000, docs(pm-skill): judge responsibility before dispatch, breaker on reopening security review #21999. Compliant.
      • Oversized with no governed path and no review: feat(metadata-core,rest,runtime,plugin-email,spec)!: the /meta doors carry no organization; organization-admin metadata authoring closes (ADR-0131 D6, #15206 S3) #22447 (4,011; C5 S3), feat(core,cli,verify): bootStack composes what serve composes — item 1 stage 2 of #22301 (HELD at stop conditions) #22381 (3,455) and feat(spec)!: a page gains an optional print declaration and a linted printable block subset; the zero-reader document schemas retire whole (#22158) #22193 (3,320). All three landed before chore(governance): the human-merge line threshold is 3,000 changed lines (HUMAN_MERGE_LINE_THRESHOLD), per the maintainer's 2026-10-09 ruling #22490 moved HUMAN_MERGE_LINE_THRESHOLD from 5,000 to 3,000 at 2026-10-09T14:44Z, and all three are under 5,000, so each met the line ruled at its landing; the sweep lists them on today's constant. No violation; nothing filed.
      • cloud, --since-ref cloud=f13fe0eca0de: 53 mainline commits, clean window: no governed merge, no oversized landing.
      • Next round, exactly: --since-ref objectstack=d748ae80afe6 --since-ref objectui=12ff256313a7 --since-ref cloud=0dd7d2baa348.
    • Duty three, the pm:awaiting-maintainer ledger: objectstack 2 (design(v18): the complete guest model in one ADR — identity, doors, grants channel, organization, public-site binding, disclosure, rate limits, and each declared guest key's fate (ADR-0090 D9 enforce-or-remove) #22146, mcp distribution: verify the remote MCP + OAuth surface against ChatGPT connectors and Codex CLI, and submit the metadata-only registry listings — the remainder of #2714 #20791) · objectui 0 · cloud 7 (Excel 导出支持 select/status 字段颜色(白底+选项色作字体色) #2757, refactor(spec): remove dead compliance subsystems (ADR-0056 D8) + mark agent visibility EXPERIMENTAL (#1901) #2693, [11.0][A2] Remove dead author-facing metadata properties (ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove) #2377, fix(automation): re-bind scheduled-flow jobs on os dev hot-reload #2313, chore(deps)(deps): bump the production-dependencies group with 17 updates #2158, feat(dogfood): in-process runtime regression gate #2020, chore: version packages #786). Every card carries its Maintainer-action: line, in the body or in a comment (the state machine admits both channels). No exit is evidenced: cloud has no tag after v1.35.0 (cloud#2757's action is the next tag and two re-plans; cloud#2693 waits on that tag), cloud PR [objectui/framework] enable.files: generic Attachments related-list (Salesforce Notes & Attachments parity) #2727 is still a draft (cloud#2377), and the other six cards' actions have no new evidence on them. The roster is presented once here; nothing moved.
    • Batch Release version 0.4.0 #310 — the seven optimisation items of the ADR-0131 family assessment, given in chat on the maintainer's instruction 「综合评估整个开发方案还有什么需要优化的。后续还有哪些开发内容和我具体解释」, and the maintainer's answer, verbatim 「cloud 冻结在 v17 没问题，其他同意你的建议。」: items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 → A (accepted); item 6 → B (cloud stays pinned on the v17 line; no 17.x maintenance line for the five framework fixes cloud#2709 lists). Records: item 1, C9 unblocked now and built by reusing the metadata-admin components, with the measured reader list and the parity-gate answer to the maintainer's 「以后 岗位、权限集是不是就不能在界面上添加了？」 → objectui#7611 6094171670; item 2, C7 split into C7a (inventory and plan, now) and C7b (apply and post-check, after the cutover) → feat(objectql,cli): inventory + migration — four fates per object, mirrors deleted only after the id→name rewrite is verified, per-table boot report (ADR-0131 D10) #15211 6094175435; items 3, 4 and 7, the cutover's three rules (one epic PM, only-delete-never-fix for the retired modules, PRs cut under 3,000 lines) → refactor(plugin-security,platform-objects,spec): retire the catalog seeders, the per-organization catalog machinery and the four catalog objects; Setup creation is an environment write under single and refused under a wall (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D5/D13) #15204 6094179271; item 5, C12 to the 18.x line with a D14 staging note → feat(spec,objectql,cli): the template install mode — a package copied once into the environment ledger, fully editable, refused on shared-database multi-tenant postures (ADR-0131 D6) #15213 6094183024; item 3's delegation → [epic] ADR-0131 — total organization ownership: no NULL organization_id (v18 line) #15194 6094203467; the triage seat's second handoff → [PM seat] triage (objectstack-wide) — 🟢 Routine · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U · trig_01NcnCtMS2tH46nUg1a5TaMJ (hourly) · state = body + the round records newer than it #6015 6094207457. No label was changed by this seat; every state move named in those records is the triage seat's or the epic PM's.
    • Decision box after this act: none in the three repos.
    • Awaiting the maintainer's own acts: summoning /pm-dispatch epic:#15194; the Tier H approval of the ADR-0131 §8/D14 execution-plan note once the triage seat files it; the nine pm:awaiting-maintainer cards above.
    • Seat post body and title: not refreshed in this summon; the status lines for summons [WIP] Add query enhancements and advanced validation features #35 and Fix homepage font color and add blog section with in-depth analytical articles using fumadocs #36 are owed to the next body refresh, and until then the opening marker and these ledger blocks carry the state, as summons Add i18n support for homepage (国际化官网首页) #31–Add critical protocol definitions: Field Widget, Plugin Lifecycle, Driver Interface, and Trigger Context #34 did.
    • No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched by this seat.

    ---

    Generated by Claude Code
20. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 10, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 10, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #36 ledger (block C · the contract review of PR #22421 rendered on the maintainer's word) — director seat, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH, 2026-10-10T05:36Z. Every write went through the relay and was read back. Opening marker: 6093572306; blocks A 6094091879, B 6094211280.

    • Contract review, PR feat(spec)!: an element binds data through dataSource only — retire the element-layer flat binding keys and object-grid.defaultFilters (#11509) #22421 (card [Direction · v18] Retire the flat object/filter data-binding family — dataSource as the single data-binding door (re-anchor of the deleted #6590 tracker) #11509, ADR-0087 retirement of the element-layer flat binding keys and object-grid.defaultFilters; ruling 6051498447 A-narrow). The maintainer, in this session, verbatim 「22421 帮我契约复审」, after the domain:spec seat's ACCEPT 6094161139 handed the review to this seat on the maintainer's word in that seat's session (「契约复审交给总监」). Rendered at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER on head 5faf12295f, read-only (the diff via a fetched ref, the card's 23 comments, the 46 check-runs on the head: 39 success, 7 rostered skips, none red; Local-runs: none) → PASS, record 6094261016 on the PR. Ten derived judgments all RIGHT (the ten tombstones, defaultFilters, the seven repeater alias spellings turned to guidance, the block layer untouched, no new public export in spec or lint — the new lint constant is not reachable from the package's exports, the lint waiver turned to a refusal at dataSource.object, the two conversions at order 35.5 before the rule-array conversion, the ADR-0087 ledger with three unreleased step-18 entries absorbed, the ledgers, the tests); semver major on spec and lint consistent with Clause-②: no (narrowing); every dev flag and acceptance note answered with its carrier. One non-blocking flag added by this seat: the seven alias spellings are refused loudly at the parse with the prescription but are not moved by os migrate meta --from 17; carrier the domain:spec seat as an Acceptance note on [Direction · v18] Retire the flat object/filter data-binding family — dataSource as the single data-binding door (re-anchor of the deleted #6590 tracker) #11509. The PR carries no needs:contract-review label, so none was removed; needs-user-decision stays on it as the maintainer-awaiting marker. Endgame left to the maintainer: an authorized APPROVED review and the human merge (4,310 changed lines, over the 3,000 line); the review requests to os-zhuang and hotlong are already on the PR. This seat readies, queues, approves and merges nothing.
    • The maintainer's question of this hour, verbatim 「C9 objectui#7611:Setup 的岗位/权限集/能力页面从通用数据门页面改成读元数据门，以后 岗位、权限集是不是就不能在界面上添加了？」, is answered in chat and recorded in the objectui#7611 ruling 6094171670: under single an organization administrator still creates and edits them from the same Setup page (the write lands in the environment ledger through the metadata door, ADR-0131 D2/D3); under a wall tenant administrators assign but do not define (the maintainer's own ruling of 2026-09-04); managed-package items stay locked (clone to customize); the cutover (refactor(plugin-security,platform-objects,spec): retire the catalog seeders, the per-organization catalog machinery and the four catalog objects; Setup creation is an environment write under single and refused under a wall (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D5/D13) #15204) owes the server half that lets an organization administrator write the three catalog types through the metadata door under single without manage_metadata.
    • Decision box after this act: none in the three repos.
    • No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched by this seat.

    ---

    Generated by Claude Code
21. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 10, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 10, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #36 ledger (block D · batch #311 presented and ruled) — director seat, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH, 2026-10-10T07:17Z. Every write went through the relay and was read back. Opening marker: 6093572306; blocks A 6094091879, B 6094211280, C 6094268732.

    • Batch chore: release v0.4.1 - fix version synchronization #311 (three cards filed this hour, presented on the maintainer's 「继续决裁」; the maintainer's answer, verbatim 「同意」, takes every recommendation):
      • objectstack#22621 (p1, security, domain:services, area:access, target:v18; who may write the security catalog after the cutover) → A (6094985249): the metadata door's gate stays manage_metadata; organization administrators stay read-only in every posture (the anti-escalation rule); B (a new narrow permission) and C (opening the door to organization administrators under single) not taken. The ruling corrects this seat's 6094171670 (its parity-gate premise was the ADR's wording, not the code) and withdraws the "server half" from the cutover. → closed completed; Ruled: line added. Pointers: objectui#7611 6095024693 (the corrected parity gate), refactor(plugin-security,platform-objects,spec): retire the catalog seeders, the per-organization catalog machinery and the four catalog objects; Setup creation is an environment write under single and refused under a wall (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D5/D13) #15204 6095027530 (the plan drops the item; C7a's --plan lists hand-widened catalog grants), docs(adr-0131): §8/D14 execution-plan note — C2's remainder and C3 land as one cutover, C7 splits into C7a/C7b, and C12 moves to the 18.x line (rulings 6094045326, 6094175435, 6094183024) #22619 6095030570 (one dated sentence on D2/D3 in the §8/D14 paragraph).
      • objectstack#22624 (ungraded; the access half of objectql: a file field reads "no file" for a record reader without sys_file read: the hydration lookup runs as the caller, and a refusal reads as absent data (split from #22590 item 1) #22593: whether a file field's sys_file metadata follows the holding record's read) → B (6094990917): the hydration follows the parent-derived verdict the download door already applies (ADR-0104 D3), for files whose reference names the record being read, delegate consulted; non-owned ids keep PR fix(objectql): a refused sys_file read marks the file field refused instead of reading as no file #22620's refused marker; A (status quo plus the marker) and C (a row-level gate plus a default-set change) not taken. → closed completed; Ruled: line added. Pointer: objectql: a file field reads "no file" for a record reader without sys_file read: the hydration lookup runs as the caller, and a refusal reads as absent data (split from #22590 item 1) #22593 6095034976 (the domain:engine seat files the execution card, Clause-②: yes).
      • objectstack#22611 (p2, enhancement, domain:spec, area:access; list views and dashboards cannot be limited to an audience; requiredPermissions has no any-of form) → A (6095014058): ListViewSchema and DashboardSchema gain requiredPermissions with the existing shape and semantics, enforced by the /meta read gate on the list and by-name reads; "or" is a capability granted to several permission sets; B (anyOf across six contracts) and C (docs only) not taken. → needs-user-decision → pm:queue (label-write, read back); Ruled: line added.
      • Each ruling carries Thread-read:, Prior rulings read:, the 自检 line and the chosen option's workload (pm-dispatch decision framework: every decision card and every director presentation states each option's development workload (maintainer-directed) #22597's rule).
    • Governed drafts: PR feat(spec)!: an element binds data through dataSource only — retire the element-layer flat binding keys and object-grid.defaultFilters (#11509) #22421 was approved, readied and armed by os-zhuang at 05:47 (the maintainer's own clicks; the contract review 6094261016 preceded them); PR docs(skills): a list view edits in place by default; a read-only list declares editInline: false (#22605, skill half) #22630 (skills, Tier H) is approved by os-zhuang and the spec seat lands it after PR feat(spec)!: ListView.userActions.editInline defaults to true on the v18 line; editInline: false is the opt-out (#22605, spec half) #22629. No approval is owed.
    • Decision box after this act: none in the three repos.
    • No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched by this seat.

    ---

    Generated by Claude Code
22. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 10, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 10, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #36 ledger (block E · batch #312 presented and ruled) — director seat, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH, 2026-10-10T11:36Z. Every write went through the relay and was read back. Opening marker: 6093572306; blocks A 6094091879, B 6094211280, C 6094268732, D 6095038886.

    • Batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #312 (two cards, presented on the maintainer's 「继续决策」; the maintainer's answer, verbatim 「同意」, takes both recommendations):
      • objectstack#22653 (p1, tooling, domain:devx, area:devpath; the required Test Core and Dogfood Regression Gate red 139 times in 51 h on superseded runs under [finding] A single cancelled shard makes the required Test Core check green over untested packages — the attestation gate zeroes the whole roster on cancelled #16157's reading) → B (6097061442): on the partial-attestation path the gates decide by the cancel cause GitHub recorded on the cancelled jobs (superseded ⇒ pass; own timeout ⇒ red naming the shard; unreadable or other ⇒ red), through the reader PR fix(ci): judge a cancelled single-leg roster by its recorded cancel cause (Dogfood Regression Gate) #22666 landed at 10:56Z; the Test Core aggregate job gains actions: read and checks: read; [finding] A single cancelled shard makes the required Test Core check green over untested packages — the attestation gate zeroes the whole roster on cancelled #16157 amended, not reversed; the whole-matrix-cancelled path is not extended (0 measured catches). A and C not taken. → needs-user-decision → pm:queue (label-write, read back); Ruled: line added (the body's three earlier readings re-sent as declared stamps, bytes unchanged).
      • objectstack#22590 item 3 (p2, domain:services, area:workflow; the activity read's visibility pre-scan caps at 2,000 rows fail-closed, a member gets 1,105 of 1,808 visible rows with total 1,105) → A as the end state with an ADR as its first deliverable, C as the interim after objectui#12081 item 8, D's state until then (6097072172): one engine-internal, non-authorable semi-join leaf pushed down by ObjectQL, implemented by driver-sql and implemented-or-refused by the four other drivers, retiring six bounded probes; the seat's premise corrected by this seat's reading: ADR-0055 alternatives (a) rejected the query-time subquery join and ADR-0056 restated it, so A reverses a recorded decision and needs the ADR first (Tier H). C: a located 400 at the cap once the Console widget is pinned. B (unbounded $in) and a raised cap not taken. → needs-user-decision → pm:blocked with Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectui#12081; the triage seat adds the ADR card as the second blocker (handoff [PM seat] triage (objectstack-wide) — 🟢 Routine · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U · trig_01NcnCtMS2tH46nUg1a5TaMJ (hourly) · state = body + the round records newer than it #6015 6097080912). Ruled: line added.
      • Each ruling carries Thread-read:, Prior rulings read:, the 自检 line and the chosen option's workload (pm-dispatch decision framework: every decision card and every director presentation states each option's development workload (maintainer-directed) #22597's rule).
    • PR feat(spec)!: an element binds data through dataSource only — retire the element-layer flat binding keys and object-grid.defaultFilters (#11509) #22421 (approved by os-zhuang at 5faf12295f, 05:47): main moved twice; the maintainer told the domain:spec seat 1 (os-tesla) in that seat's session 「22421 冲突，你接手处理。」; the seat merged main at 07:42 and, after the queue ejected the PR at 09:42, again at 09:45 (head db0c56a815), with the hop measured pure (41 of 43 paths byte-identical; the two others are main's stub and the ledger totals). The approval stands undismissed; auto-merge dropped at the ejection; the seat re-arms on a green head. Nothing owed by the maintainer.
    • Ruled through the maintainer's direct channel, not re-presented: objectstack#22649 → A (6096124407, the skills seat's presentation R1, maintainer 「22649 同意 A」), with its three execution cards [Ruling A on #22649] @objectstack/skills: the published skills catalog ships as a versioned package in the fixed group — the build copies skills/** in and files lists only it; the compatibility line and metadata.version derive from the package version #22658, [Ruling A on #22649] create-objectstack installs the skills catalog from the installed @objectstack/skills package, not from GitHub main; the scaffolded project depends on it at the spec's version #22659, [Ruling A on #22649] docs: the skills install command reads the catalog from the installed @objectstack/skills package; the GitHub path is documented as the next (unreleased main) channel only #22668 filed by that seat.
    • Decision box after this act: none in the three repos.
    • No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched by this seat.

    ---

    Generated by Claude Code
23. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 10, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 10, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #36 ledger (block F · an empty box on the maintainer's 「总监决裁」; duty one re-run on the new window; duty three re-read; the summon's rulings followed through) — director seat, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH, 2026-10-10T14:32Z. Every write went through the relay and was read back. Opening marker: 6093572306; blocks A 6094091879, B 6094211280, C 6094268732, D 6095038886, E 6097084816.

    • Decision box read in this act: needs-user-decision issues objectstack 0 · objectui 0 · cloud 0; no open PR in the three repos carries the label. No batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #313 forms.
    • Duty one, the governed-merge audit, second window of this summon (check-governed-merges.mjs, --since-ref objectstack=d748ae80afe6 --since-ref objectui=12ff256313a7, cloud 0dd7d2baa348; exit 0 on both runs): objectstack 44 mainline commits, objectui 3, cloud 0. 5 governed merges and 3 oversized landings, every one on its tier's record: docs(adr-0131): the D14 execution-plan note — one cutover, the C7 split, C12 on 18.x, and the D2/D3 reading #22650 (docs/adr, the ADR-0131 D14 execution-plan note this summon's rulings owed: one cutover, the C7 split, C12 on 18.x, the D2/D3 reading), docs(adr-0043,skill-automation): open-time notification is approval.requested; one-tap links stay remind()-only (#22631, Tier H half) #22652 (docs/adr + skills), docs(pm-dispatch): decision cards and director presentations state each option's development workload #22654 (.claude/**, the workload rule of pm-dispatch decision framework: every decision card and every director presentation states each option's development workload (maintainer-directed) #22597), docs(skills): a list view edits in place by default; a read-only list declares editInline: false (#22605, skill half) #22630 (skills) and the oversized feat(metadata-protocol,objectql,rest,spec)!: every metadata read is environment → code; legacy organization rows and sealed overlays are reported at boot, not served (#15206 S5) #22628 (6,188; C5 S5) and spec(changes): delete the committed spec-changes.json and its merge=os-regen route; both projections are gitignored and generated at publish only (#22449 B′, card ③) #22638 (8,038; the committed spec-changes deletion), all merged by os-zhuang, listed for recognition; feat(spec)!: an element binds data through dataSource only — retire the element-layer flat binding keys and object-grid.defaultFilters (#11509) #22421 (4,129) landed by the fleet bot on os-zhuang's undismissed APPROVED review at 5faf12295f after two pure merges of main (the seat's measurement 6095933602), compliant; docs(pm-skill): platform-readings diet — delete the readings a scripts/pm tool now holds (tool first, text second) #22684 (.claude/**, Tier S) landed by the fleet bot with a ## Contract review PASS record 6098113640 on its head e74ef6211a, compliant. cloud: clean window. Next round, exactly: --since-ref objectstack=96469912833f --since-ref objectui=de302c731592 --since-ref cloud=0dd7d2baa348.
    • Duty three, the pm:awaiting-maintainer ledger: objectstack 3 ([finding] the @objectstack/hono catch-all's 409 METADATA_CONFLICT names the current version only in prose: measure whether the hosted runtime's PUT /meta reaches it, and if so carry currentVersion as data (a packages/spec change) #22222 new since block B, its Maintainer-action: line in 6095616631: one hosted-tenant reading of the 409 METADATA_CONFLICT envelope; design(v18): the complete guest model in one ADR — identity, doors, grants channel, organization, public-site binding, disclosure, rate limits, and each declared guest key's fate (ADR-0090 D9 enforce-or-remove) #22146; mcp distribution: verify the remote MCP + OAuth surface against ChatGPT connectors and Codex CLI, and submit the metadata-only registry listings — the remainder of #2714 #20791) · objectui 0 · cloud 7 (Excel 导出支持 select/status 字段颜色(白底+选项色作字体色) #2757, refactor(spec): remove dead compliance subsystems (ADR-0056 D8) + mark agent visibility EXPERIMENTAL (#1901) #2693, [11.0][A2] Remove dead author-facing metadata properties (ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove) #2377, fix(automation): re-bind scheduled-flow jobs on os dev hot-reload #2313, chore(deps)(deps): bump the production-dependencies group with 17 updates #2158, feat(dogfood): in-process runtime regression gate #2020, chore: version packages #786). No exit is evidenced: no cloud tag after v1.35.0, cloud PR [objectui/framework] enable.files: generic Attachments related-list (Salesforce Notes & Attachments parity) #2727 still a draft, no new evidence on the other cards. Nothing moved.
    • This summon's rulings, followed through by the lanes (read, not written, in this act): [Decision] ADR-0131 剩余部分（C2 余下阶段 + C3）：继续分段、合并成一次切换，还是改成「registry 支撑的对象」 #22601 B → the cutover is under way: [epic] ADR-0131 — total organization ownership: no NULL organization_id (v18 line) #15194 carries pm:epic and refactor(plugin-security,platform-objects,spec): retire the catalog seeders, the per-organization catalog machinery and the four catalog objects; Setup creation is an environment write under single and refused under a wall (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D5/D13) #15204 and objectui#7611 are pm:dispatched to the epic PM (marchtian); the ADR note landed (PR docs(adr-0131): the D14 execution-plan note — one cutover, the C7 split, C12 on 18.x, and the D2/D3 reading #22650, docs(adr-0131): §8/D14 execution-plan note — C2's remainder and C3 land as one cutover, C7 splits into C7a/C7b, and C12 moves to the 18.x line (rulings 6094045326, 6094175435, 6094183024) #22619 closed); C7a landed (C7a (ADR-0131 D10, split from #15211): the migration inventory file, the read-only os migrate --plan, and the design of the ceremony's completion marker #22617, PR feat(cli): os migrate organization-ownership — the ADR-0131 D10 inventory and the read-only ceremony plan (C7a) #22643 → cc305a3cfc); feat(spec,objectql,cli): the template install mode — a package copied once into the environment ledger, fully editable, refused on shared-database multi-tenant postures (ADR-0131 D6) #15213 lost target:v18. spec (17.7.0): a list view or dashboard cannot be limited to an audience, and requiredPermissions has no any-of form — an app cannot show each audience only its own views and boards #22611 A → landed (PR feat(spec): requiredPermissions on ListViewSchema and DashboardSchema, the audience gate, planned until the /meta read gate applies it (#22611) #22665, closed completed); the rest-gate half rest(/meta read gate): enforce a list view's and a dashboard's requiredPermissions on the list read and the by-name read, so each audience is served only its own views and boards (the rest half of #22611) #22639 waits on the unlock scan. [Decision] should a file field's sys_file metadata (name, size, type) follow the holding record's read, as the download door and attachment rows already do? (access half of #22593) #22624 B → objectql: a file field's metadata follows the parent-derived verdict the download door applies — hydrate a field-owned file for a reader refused sys_file read (ruling B on #22624) #22637 dispatched. [Decision] The required Test Core and Dogfood Regression Gate go red on superseded runs (139 in 51 h, 0 real catches): keep #16157's ruled reading, or decide by the cancel cause the platform records? #22653 B → dispatched, PR fix(ci): judge a partially attested cancelled matrix by each shard's recorded cancel cause (Test Core, Dogfood Regression Gate) #22685 open. runtime (17.7.0): file fields read "no file" for a record reader without sys_file read, flow run summaries report acted 0 while notifying, and the activity read pre-scan caps at 2000 rows fail-closed #22590 item 3 → the ADR card ADR (ruling A on #22590 item 3): one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read"; ADR-0055 alternatives row (a) revisited for this one leaf #22678 is filed (pm:queue, domain:engine); the triage seat still owes it as a second Blocked-by: on runtime (17.7.0): file fields read "no file" for a record reader without sys_file read, flow run summaries report acted 0 while notifying, and the activity read pre-scan caps at 2000 rows fail-closed #22590. [Decision] 切换后谁能在 Setup 里新建/编辑岗位和权限集：保持今天的权限（持 manage_metadata 者），还是放开给组织管理员（安全边界） #22621 A → the corrected parity gate is on objectui#7611 with the epic PM.
    • Awaiting the maintainer's own acts: the ten pm:awaiting-maintainer cards above; the Tier H approval of the ADR card ADR (ruling A on #22590 item 3): one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read"; ADR-0055 alternatives row (a) revisited for this one leaf #22678 once its PR opens. Nothing else.
    • No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched by this seat.

    ---

    Generated by Claude Code
24. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 10, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 10, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #36 ledger (block G · batch #313 presented and ruled) — director seat, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH, 2026-10-10T17:53Z. Every write went through the relay and was read back. Opening marker: 6093572306; blocks A 6094091879, B 6094211280, C 6094268732, D 6095038886, E 6097084816, F 6098573011.

    • Batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #313 (one card and one governed draft, presented on the maintainer's 「总监决裁」; the maintainer's answer, verbatim 「同意」):
      • objectstack#22444 (p3, domain:spec; ComponentPropsMap has no list-view row, and the page carrier spells the binding objectName / viewType where the spec and the react layer spell it data / type) → C (6100463199): the page carrier converges on the spec spelling, objectui first (the plugin-list registration and the page read of the list kind, then the console pin), then the list-view row with by-name refusals of the old spellings and an ADR-0087 D2 conversion for stored page nodes; the row stays lint-tier (no new gate), the declaration line is Clause-②: yes (widening) with one contract-review-tier review. A (ListViewSchema verbatim, false positives steering authors into a silent kanban-to-grid fall-back) and B (a page-only envelope re-declaring the two words [finding] The #11284 convergence shipped only its producer half: the react-blocks contract deprecates objectName / viewType on ListView in favour of data={{ provider: 'object', object }} / type, and the lint blesses that spelling — but objectui's ListView reads neither, so the canonical spelling validates green and renders an empty list #14791 retired) not taken. → needs-user-decision → pm:queue (label-write, read back); Ruled: line added and the filing-time ⛔ line struck. The ruling carries Thread-read:, Prior rulings read:, the 自检 line and the chosen option's workload (pm-dispatch decision framework: every decision card and every director presentation states each option's development workload (maintainer-directed) #22597's rule).
      • PR feat(skills): derive the compatibility majors and metadata.version from the workspace version #22692 (Tier H, skills/**; [Ruling A on #22649] @objectstack/skills: the published skills catalog ships as a versioned package in the fixed group — the build copies skills/** in and files lists only it; the compatibility line and metadata.version derive from the package version #22658's PR 2, the derived metadata.version and the --fix leg of check-skill-compatibility-version.mjs): the four-piece set is complete (ACCEPT 6098628523 on [Ruling A on #22649] @objectstack/skills: the published skills catalog ships as a versioned package in the fixed group — the build copies skills/** in and files lists only it; the compatibility line and metadata.version derive from the package version #22658, contract review PASS 6098612738 at 5567d606c, 速读终稿 6098618150, review requests to hotlong and os-zhuang); presented as one line. Still awaiting the maintainer's APPROVED review on the PR (no review on it at this read); the stale red of the closing-target claim guard (run 14:22Z, before the claim extension 6098607178 at 14:36Z) is the skills seat's to re-run before landing.
    • Decision box after this act: none in the three repos.
    • Awaiting the maintainer's own acts: the APPROVE on PR feat(skills): derive the compatibility majors and metadata.version from the workspace version #22692; the ten pm:awaiting-maintainer cards of block F; the Tier H approval of ADR (ruling A on #22590 item 3): one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read"; ADR-0055 alternatives row (a) revisited for this one leaf #22678's ADR PR once it opens.
    • No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched by this seat.

    ---

    Generated by Claude Code
25. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 11, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #36 ledger (block H · batch #314 presented; item 1 ruled and recorded; items 2 and 3 open) — director seat, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH, 2026-10-11T02:25Z. Every write went through the relay and was read back. Opening marker: 6093572306; blocks A 6094091879, B 6094211280, C 6094268732, D 6095038886, E 6097084816, F 6098573011, G 6100477204.

    • Batch [WIP] Update action run step in workflow #314, presented on the maintainer's 「继续决策」: objectstack#22636 (the runtime publish door's per-write snapshot; reversing ruling 5791822697 item 3), objectstack#22708 (the fleet relay token and workflows: write), PR docs(adr): ADR-0139 — one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read" (ruling A on #22590 item 3) #22707 (ADR-0139, Tier H, awaiting the APPROVED review). objectui and cloud boxes empty. The maintainer's answer, verbatim 「22708 同意加权限 22636 同意;22707 帮我参考主流相关平台,重新深度综合分析,当前的开发方案是最佳解法吗,」.
      • lint(runtime gate): a flow write's per-write snapshot carries no actions and no other flows, so a flow CEL root rule cannot see the entrances that hand a flow its record (W, from #22565) #22636 → B (6104584601): ruling 5791822697 item 3 stands, the stand-down is by design; the card carries the small lint PR (by-design wording and pins, the objectName-less trigger opens the flow, the map-child pin; Clause-②: yes (widening)); W as filed is not built. needs-user-decision → pm:queue (label-write, read back: enhancement, pm:queue, domain:spec, priority:p3, area:workflow); the Ruled: line added to the body and the filing-time ⛔ line struck. The ruling carries Thread-read:, Prior rulings read:, the 自检 line and the chosen option's workload (pm-dispatch decision framework: every decision card and every director presentation states each option's development workload (maintainer-directed) #22597's rule).
      • [Decision] fleet relay: should the auto-merge row spend workflows: write so seats can enqueue pulls that change .github/workflows/**, or stay a human-queue item? #22708: the maintainer chose to add the permission; the letter is not yet given (A, a standing workflows: write on every stroke, or C, stroke-scoped to a pull that changes a workflow file). Asked in chat; ⛔ nothing written on the card; it stays needs-user-decision. Noted for the record: PR feat(skills): publish the skills catalog as @objectstack/skills in the fixed group #22691, the pull the card was filed from, carries 3 red checks on 60b8d9a1f4 (TypeScript Type Check, Type Check · source gates, Scaffold outside the monorepo), so it is the skills seat's to fix before any enqueue.
      • PR docs(adr): ADR-0139 — one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read" (ruling A on #22590 item 3) #22707: the maintainer asked for a comparative analysis against mainstream platforms before approving. Delivered in chat; ⛔ nothing written on the PR or on ADR (ruling A on #22590 item 3): one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read"; ADR-0055 alternatives row (a) revisited for this one leaf #22678; the PR stays a draft awaiting the APPROVED review (27 success / 15 skipped on f87ef2345a, mergeable clean, contract review PASS 6101073007, 速读终稿 6101137494).
    • Also read this act: PR feat(skills): derive the compatibility majors and metadata.version from the workspace version #22692 (block G's open item) was APPROVED by os-zhuang at 2026-10-11T01:51Z on 5567d606c5; its one red check is the stale closing-target claim guard, the skills seat's to re-run before landing — no longer the maintainer's. PR build(spec): the migration registry is generated at build and leaves git #22706 ([Decision] the migration registry registry.ts is the last committed generated aggregate on the ADR-0087 D3 path: keep it and finish B′, or generate it at build #22554 B) carries the APPROVED review on 81ae60b20a; its head is now ef18885dbe, a merge of main whose only conflict was the generated registry.ts, resolved losslessly (verified: the 58 other files are byte-identical to main's side; the one registry.ts hunk main added sits inside the semantic:18 region); the spec seat lands it through the queue.
    • Decision box after this act: objectstack#22708 (letter pending) and PR docs(adr): ADR-0139 — one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read" (ruling A on #22590 item 3) #22707 (Tier H approval pending). objectui and cloud: none.
    • No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched by this seat.

    ---

    Generated by Claude Code
26. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 11, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #36 ledger (block I · batch #314 items 2 and 3 ruled and recorded; the batch is closed) — director seat, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH, 2026-10-11T03:02Z. Every write went through the relay and was read back. Opening marker: 6093572306; blocks A 6094091879, B 6094211280, C 6094268732, D 6095038886, E 6097084816, F 6098573011, G 6100477204, H 6104600478.

    • [Decision] fleet relay: should the auto-merge row spend workflows: write so seats can enqueue pulls that change .github/workflows/**, or stay a human-queue item? #22708 → A (6104822731), on the maintainer's 「22708 同意加权限」 then, asked for the letter, 「22708 A」: the relay token carries workflows: write on every stroke (automerge_enable alsoSpends: ['workflows'], the literal mint input, the PERMISSIONS header and set updated together, validate and execute self-tests); the grant is recorded beside the token's declared set citing the ruling so SKILL.md:263's human-floor sentence and the wider token read together; the implementing PR changes fleet-write.yml and is therefore the last workflow-file pull a human enqueues. This seat's recommendation was B with fallback C and is recorded as such in the ruling; the maintainer ruled A. needs-user-decision → pm:queue (label-write, read back: pm:queue, domain:skills); the Ruled: line added to the body (no filing-time ⛔ line on this card). Thread-read none (0 comments before the ruling), prior rulings read, 自检 line and the chosen option's workload are in the record.
    • PR docs(adr): ADR-0139 — one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read" (ruling A on #22590 item 3) #22707 (ADR-0139, Tier H) → the maintainer's 「22707 同意」, recorded as a ruling pointer on its card ADR (ruling A on #22590 item 3): one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read"; ADR-0055 alternatives row (a) revisited for this one leaf #22678 (6104842076): approve as is, D3 stands (no capability bit; MongoDB refuses loudly until O3); the comparative reading against mainstream platforms the maintainer asked for is summarised there with two notes for the execution cards (E5 measures the branch count; O5 widens into a "scope as a relation" follow-on candidate), ⛔ no change to the record's text. ⛔ Not an approval and not a lift: the APPROVED review on the PR is the maintainer's own act and is still owed at this write (no review on f87ef2345a); this seat clicked nothing. No label changed on ADR (ruling A on #22590 item 3): one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read"; ADR-0055 alternatives row (a) revisited for this one leaf #22678 or on the PR.
    • Decision box after this act: none in the three repos' cards. PR docs(adr): ADR-0139 — one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read" (ruling A on #22590 item 3) #22707 keeps needs-user-decision as the Tier H marker until the maintainer's APPROVED review lands and the domain:engine seat lands it.
    • Awaiting the maintainer's own acts: the APPROVED review on PR docs(adr): ADR-0139 — one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read" (ruling A on #22590 item 3) #22707; the ten pm:awaiting-maintainer cards of block F (unchanged at this read, not re-swept this act).
    • No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched by this seat.

    ---

    Generated by Claude Code
27. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 11, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #36 ledger (block J · batch #315 presented, ruled and recorded) — director seat, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH, 2026-10-11T04:33Z. Every write went through the relay and was read back. Opening marker: 6093572306; blocks A 6094091879, B 6094211280, C 6094268732, D 6095038886, E 6097084816, F 6098573011, G 6100477204, H 6104600478, I 6104849008.

    • Batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #315, presented on the maintainer's 「继续决策」; the maintainer's answer, verbatim 「同意」: objectstack#22757 and objectui#12113 (cloud's box empty). PR docs(adr): ADR-0139 — one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read" (ruling A on #22590 item 3) #22707 (ADR-0139, Tier H) carried as the standing line: no APPROVED review on f87ef2345a at 2026-10-11T04:22Z.
      • objectstack#22757 → A (6105447950): on the hosted shape the inbound-hook route POST /automation/hooks/:flowName/:hookId admits an anonymous request through to trigger-api's own HMAC check, equal to self-hosted — one route-exact ADR-0069 allow-list row honoured by the anonymous floor, a runtime dispatcher domain, the spec member (Clause-②: yes), the plugin member — under three conditions recorded in the ruling (exact four-segment POST-only row with its self-test pins; constant-time per-hook verification measured as the boundary on the hosted shape; replay protection, if absent, a separate hardening card). B not taken. needs-user-decision → pm:queue (label-write, read back: priority:p2, security, pm:queue, domain:services, area:workflow); Ruled: line added, filing-time ⛔ line struck. Triage splits the three segments per the body's 裁后执行.
      • objectui#12113 → A1 (6105451919): StudioHomePage retires; the Studio app's root resolves to the app's own first navigation item (the landing resolver learns component items), the Studio-only sidebar Home entry and the page's readers go with it; A2 (redirect to /studio) and B (keep) not taken. needs-user-decision → pm:queue (label-write, read back: pm:queue, priority:p3, domain:ui, area:studio); Ruled: line added, filing-time ⛔ line struck. The domain:ui lane claims it.
      • Both rulings carry Thread-read:, Prior rulings read:, the 自检 line and the chosen option's workload (pm-dispatch decision framework: every decision card and every director presentation states each option's development workload (maintainer-directed) #22597's rule); premises re-read on origin/main of each repo before presenting.
    • Decision box after this act: none in the three repos' cards. PR docs(adr): ADR-0139 — one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read" (ruling A on #22590 item 3) #22707 keeps needs-user-decision as its Tier H marker until the maintainer's APPROVED review.
    • Awaiting the maintainer's own acts: the APPROVED review on PR docs(adr): ADR-0139 — one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read" (ruling A on #22590 item 3) #22707; the ten pm:awaiting-maintainer cards of block F (not re-swept this act).
    • No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched by this seat.

    ---

    Generated by Claude Code
28. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 11, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #36 ledger (block K · batch #316 presented; items 1 and 3 ruled and recorded, item 2 held) — director seat, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH, 2026-10-11T08:40Z. Every write went through the relay and was read back. Opening marker: 6093572306; blocks A 6094091879, B 6094211280, C 6094268732, D 6095038886, E 6097084816, F 6098573011, G 6100477204, H 6104600478, I 6104849008, J 6105473035.

    • Scope widened to hotcrm: the maintainer had objectstack-ai/hotcrm attached to this session, and its box was read with the other three repos (objectos not attached).
    • Batch Fix Vite build failure: suppress optional driver-memory dynamic import warning #316, presented on the maintainer's 「总监决裁」; the maintainer's answer, verbatim 「同意」.
      • Item 1, objectstack#22795 → A (6107185582). The ASKER's read decides whether explain discloses that a record exists:
        • the nonexistent-id shape, layers included, for an asker who cannot read the row;
        • the full record story for one who can;
        • the same rule on the write verbs, where an asker who can read sees visible: false plus the principal's read decider;
        • the batch form follows, and the protocol text says it;
        • B and C not taken.
        • needs-user-decision → pm:queue, read back: priority:p2, security, pm:queue, domain:services, area:access.
        • Pointer 6107202712 on security(explain): explain's read verdict for a row the caller cannot read disagrees with the read door, and differs from its answer for an id no row carries (a controlled_by_parent detail under an unreadable master, measured) #22792: claimed, item 1 in flight; item 2 comes as a later round on that card.
      • Item 3, objectstack#22519 → A (6107211425). It was taken off the pm:awaiting-maintainer ledger because it waited on an unanswered question, not on an action.
        • A master-detail detail write whose header the caller cannot read answers as a nonexistent header, for every detail, through the preview's two-read shape. Stored values stay judged for readable headers.
        • Step 1 struck. ADR-0055 not edited. B, C and D not taken.
        • pm:awaiting-maintainer → pm:queue, read back: bug, priority:p2, security, pm:queue, target:v18, domain:engine, area:access.
      • Both rulings carry Thread-read:, Prior rulings read:, the 自检 line and the chosen option's workload (pm-dispatch decision framework: every decision card and every director presentation states each option's development workload (maintainer-directed) #22597's rule). The Ruled: line was added to each body and the filing-time ⛔ line struck.
      • Item 2, hotcrm#2057: held, not ruled. After 「同意」 the maintainer asked whether this is the platform's to fix. This seat answered in chat that the dead end is the platform's admin_rescue:
        • the queue half landed (objectstack#22725 → PR feat(spec,plugin-approvals,rest): an unstaffed arm on the approvals inbox read returns an admin_rescue request to a caller who may override it #22775);
        • the console half is objectui#12102, blocked on cloud#2709;
        • the notification-on-open half has no card.
        • This seat now recommends that hotcrm not change and the platform complete the rescue path, and has asked for one letter. ⛔ No ruling and no label change on hotcrm#2057 until the maintainer answers.
    • Ledger:
      • PR docs(adr): ADR-0139 — one engine-internal semi-join leaf, "the ids of object X this caller may read" (ruling A on #22590 item 3) #22707 (ADR-0139): the maintainer's APPROVED review landed at 2026-10-11T06:02Z and the PR merged. The standing line is cleared.
      • New on the pm:awaiting-maintainer ledger: objectstack#22708. The relay's workflows: write edit was refused by the dev session's permission classifier; the maintainer owes the edit's clearance in a session of their own and a check of the fleet App's Workflows permission. Presented once with batch Fix Vite build failure: suppress optional driver-memory dynamic import warning #316.
      • The other ten cards of block F are unchanged.
    • No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched by this seat.

    ---

    Generated by Claude Code
29. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 11, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #36 ledger (block L · batch #316 item 2 ruled and recorded, so batch #316 is closed) — director seat, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH, 2026-10-11T11:09Z. Every write went through the relay and was read back. Previous block: K 6107226521.

    • Item 2, [decision] On a fresh install nobody can approve a new account or a $100K+ deal: 8 approval nodes route only to unstaffed positions (admin_rescue today) — fall back to the org owner? hotcrm#2057 → A, with platform route P1 (6108375797). The maintainer's answers in order, verbatim:

      • 「同意」;
      • then 「hotcrm#2057:新装的系统里,三类默认审批没人能批，这个应该是改平台的功能吧」, answered in chat → 「平台」;
      • then 「作为一个工作流引擎，岗位没人时转给 owner 真的合理吗，有没有更好的方案」, answered in chat with P1 or P2 → 「同意 P1」.

      Only the last is the ruling.

      • HotCRM keeps admin_rescue and changes nothing.
      • The platform opens an empty admin_rescue slate on the tenant's administrators as named approvers (the authority isOverrideActor's tenant arm trusts, platform admins excluded), retires the approvals: a request opened under onEmptyApprovers: 'admin_rescue' is in no one's pending queue — listRequests / countRequests have no arm that returns it to the callers who can decide it #22725 unstaffed arm, and rewords the lint message. The Approval routed to an empty position permanently locks the record (no admin override, no recovery) #3424 override stays as break-glass.
      • B, C, D and P2 not taken; a setup health page is out of scope.
      • needs-user-decision → pm:blocked, read back: pm:blocked, priority:p2. The Ruled: line and Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#22824 added to the body.

    • Filed in this act: objectstack#22824 (filing gate ③, quoting the maintainer verbatim), the P1 platform change, with no labels so triage grades it.

    • Pointer 6108389248 on objectui#12102: superseded, ⛔ do not build. approvals: an empty slate under onEmptyApprovers: 'admin_rescue' opens on the tenant's administrators as named approvers, not as a nameless rescue request (retires the #22725 unstaffed arm) #22824's Done-when item 8 has triage close it as not planned.

    • Decision box: empty at block K's scan, except item 2 above. A fresh scan follows in this act for batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #317, on the maintainer's 「继续决策」.

    • No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched by this seat.

    ---

    Generated by Claude Code
30. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 11, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #36 ledger (block M · batch #317 presented, ruled and recorded) — director seat, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH, 2026-10-11T11:25Z. Every write went through the relay and was read back. Previous block: L.

    • Batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #317, presented on the maintainer's 「继续决策」; the maintainer's answer, verbatim 「同意」:
      • objectstack#22801 → A (6108478638): a package's isDefault permission set reaches every signed-in user only through one explicit, deployment-level acceptance by a manage_metadata holder, and the acceptance takes effect.
        • everyone is re-derived as the baseline plus the accepted defaults, recomputed on accept, uninstall and publish, with the high-risk gate on the definition side. ADR-0090 D5 is unchanged.
        • B and C not taken.
        • Added measurement: HotCRM declares no isDefault permission set.
        • Labels → pm:queue, read back: priority:p1, security, pm:queue, domain:services, target:v18, area:access.
        • The epic:#15194 seat dispatches refactor(plugin-security,platform-objects,spec): retire the catalog seeders, the per-organization catalog machinery and the four catalog objects; Setup creation is an environment write under single and refused under a wall (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D5/D13) #15204 U2.
      • objectstack#22805 → B (6108492902): guidance first, then the inbound door refuses body-only sha256= (order only, no window). The outbound §6.2 contract is unchanged. A and C not taken.
        • Grade and lane set in this act; labels read back: priority:p2, security, pm:queue, domain:services, area:workflow.
        • The services seat files the guidance card and the Blocked-by: refusal card.
      • objectstack#15213 → B (6108509158): the second install mode is spelled unmanaged (the Salesforce and Dataverse term, already in ADR-0086). installMode / --install-mode as the box proposed. A (copy) and C (template) not taken.
        • Labels → pm:queue, read back: priority:p2, pm:queue, domain:cli, domain:spec, domain:engine.
        • The seat files the ADR-0131 Tier H spelling note card. S1 is claimable now, and the seat claims S2.
      • Each ruling carries Thread-read:, Prior rulings read:, the 自检 line and the chosen option's workload (pm-dispatch decision framework: every decision card and every director presentation states each option's development workload (maintainer-directed) #22597's rule). The Ruled: line was added to each body, and filing-time or stale ⛔ lines were struck where present ([Decision] 入站 webhook 签名：要不要在入站门拒收不带时间戳的旧签名（sha256= 正文签名）？发送方指引何时改为推荐带时间戳的新签名？ #22805, feat(spec,objectql,cli): the template install mode — a package copied once into the environment ledger, fully editable, refused on shared-database multi-tenant postures (ADR-0131 D6) #15213).
    • Owed to the maintainer from this batch: APPROVED reviews on two Tier H PRs when they open: [Decision] 入站 webhook 签名：要不要在入站门拒收不带时间戳的旧签名（sha256= 正文签名）？发送方指引何时改为推荐带时间戳的新签名？ #22805's skill guidance, and feat(spec,objectql,cli): the template install mode — a package copied once into the environment ledger, fully editable, refused on shared-database multi-tenant postures (ADR-0131 D6) #15213's ADR-0131 spelling note.
    • No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched by this seat.

    ---

    Generated by Claude Code
31. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 11, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #36 ledger (block N · maintainer-action ledger re-read on the maintainer's question 「awaiting-maintainer 有哪些需要我处理的」) — director seat, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH, 2026-10-11T14:22Z. Every write went through the relay and was read back. Previous block: M 6108524353.

    • objectstack#22708 is off the ledger without this seat. The maintainer cleared the edit, and skills seat 2 landed it and closed the card.
    • Exits in this act:
      • cloud#2020: action done, closed completed (6109985985). AI_GATEWAY_API_KEY is evidenced by the scheduled golden-journey.yml runs getting past the step that refuses a run without it. The boundary gate was green on six consecutive nights, 10-03 through 10-08, and again on 10-10. The 10-09 red was an objectui install failure, not the gate.
      • cloud#2158: action obsolete, pm:awaiting-maintainer → pm:retriage (6109992821). MONITOR_ALERT_WEBHOOK_URL is read by no workflow since docs(adr): ADR-0070 Accepted — P1–P3 implemented, merged & live-verified #2292 and fix(showcase): command-center throughput bars render (follow-up to #2496) #2497. Triage is asked to close the card or re-scope it to a drill.
    • Still owed by the maintainer (8):
      • cloud#2757, cloud#2377 and cloud#2693: one cloud release act. Ready and merge PR [objectui/framework] enable.files: generic Attachments related-list (Salesforce Notes & Attachments parity) #2727 just before the tag, cut the next v* (20 commits since v1.35.0), then re-plan demo 363688d5.
      • cloud#2313: the storage-vocabulary push, staging then production.
      • cloud#786: the Anthropic connector directory submission.
      • objectstack#20791: the ChatGPT connectors and Codex CLI readings plus the four registry listings (mcp distribution: a server.json for the official MCP registry, in this repo, from the shipped surface (the dev half of #20791) #21494 has closed, so the official listing is unblocked).
      • objectstack#22222: one hosted-tenant 409 reading.
      • objectstack#22146: the ADR-0138 criterion 2 anonymous sweep, in an environment that permits it.
    • No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched by this seat.

    ---

    Generated by Claude Code