Skip to content

Add top-level License annotation - #4411

Draft
beutlich wants to merge 1 commit into
modelica:masterfrom
beutlich:add-top-level-license-annotation
Draft

Add top-level License annotation#4411
beutlich wants to merge 1 commit into
modelica:masterfrom
beutlich:add-top-level-license-annotation

Conversation

@beutlich

@beutlich beutlich commented Jun 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@beutlich beutlich added the requires Modelica 3.7 Issue that requires Modelica Language Specification 3.7 label Jun 3, 2024
@beutlich
beutlich force-pushed the add-top-level-license-annotation branch from 1672d49 to e29c4bf Compare June 3, 2024 18:55
Comment thread Complex.mo
@beutlich
beutlich force-pushed the add-top-level-license-annotation branch from e29c4bf to a729680 Compare June 5, 2024 16:27
@tobolar

tobolar commented Jun 7, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In the Modelica Spec v3.7-dev, there is both the annotation License and an annotation record of the same name (as a part of the Protection record). I'm confused...

Anyway, the suffix "-dev" feels like a development version of Spec. So why to implement it in MSL already now?

@beutlich

beutlich commented Jun 7, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Yes, that's why it's labeled requires Modelica 3.7.

@beutlich
beutlich force-pushed the add-top-level-license-annotation branch from a729680 to aaba440 Compare June 11, 2024 18:58
@tobolar

tobolar commented Jun 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What I mean is that a development version (of Spec) is not a release and can still change. Maybe unlikely for the License annotation but who knows.

@beutlich

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

What I mean is that a development version (of Spec) is not a release and can still change. Maybe unlikely for the License annotation but who knows.

This just seems too unlikely given the voting results:

Voting on MCP-0029 has ended.

100% are in favor.

See mail to MD from Fri, 10 May 2024 14:35:17 +0200.

@beutlich
beutlich force-pushed the add-top-level-license-annotation branch from aaba440 to 3b147e0 Compare June 19, 2024 19:37
@beutlich
beutlich force-pushed the add-top-level-license-annotation branch from 3b147e0 to 075f1f4 Compare July 19, 2024 19:36
@beutlich
beutlich marked this pull request as draft July 19, 2024 19:36
@beutlich
beutlich force-pushed the add-top-level-license-annotation branch from 075f1f4 to 5473626 Compare October 14, 2024 18:45
@beutlich
beutlich force-pushed the add-top-level-license-annotation branch from 5473626 to b20ed68 Compare November 16, 2024 09:49
@beutlich
beutlich force-pushed the add-top-level-license-annotation branch from b20ed68 to 44de02d Compare December 28, 2024 08:55
@beutlich
beutlich force-pushed the add-top-level-license-annotation branch from 44de02d to 569c907 Compare January 15, 2025 20:10
@beutlich
beutlich force-pushed the add-top-level-license-annotation branch from 569c907 to 59f9e75 Compare May 20, 2025 19:33
@beutlich
beutlich force-pushed the add-top-level-license-annotation branch from 59f9e75 to 49148dc Compare April 19, 2026 13:51
@beutlich
beutlich force-pushed the add-top-level-license-annotation branch from 49148dc to b4b31a8 Compare August 13, 2026 16:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

requires Modelica 3.7 Issue that requires Modelica Language Specification 3.7

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants