Repository navigation
Dev: Make getInsertID() more consistent with save() #9233
Description
Activity
- addedbugVerified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix themVerified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix them
on Oct 22, 2024 IMO this may be quite problematic.
The
insertIDis closely related to theinsertquery - using the same variable for theupdatequery can be confusing.Others' code may rely on the fact that
insertIDis only populated if a new record is added to the table.So this "small" change may break many things for others.
Reacted by kenjis- removedbugVerified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix themVerified issues on the current code behavior or pull requests that will fix them
on Oct 22, 2024 - changed the title
[-]Bug: Make getInsertID() more consistent with save()[/-][+]Dev: Make getInsertID() more consistent with save()[/+]on Oct 22, 2024 getInsertID()returns inserted row’s primary key.You can retrieve the last inserted row’s primary key using the getInsertID() method.
https://codeigniter.com/user_guide/models/model.htmlIt is not
getUpdateID().
The method name is very important. I don't thinkgetInsertID()returns updated row's primary key.Also, this proposal may break existing apps. So it is not acceptable.
You should show use cases why you need this, and it seems better to add a new method for it.
Also, this proposal may break existing apps. So it is not acceptable.
Fair point.
You should show use cases why you need this
I tried to above; let me be even more clear.
If
save()is a convenience method to allow writing a controller method that does not need to figure out if it is saving a new record or updating an existing one, the current behaviour ofgetInsertID()in many cases negates that convenience.After either operation, we typically need the primary key of the new/updated record in order to do something else with it. Having to perform logic to figure out which model method to use to get that ID means we might as well not have used
save()in the first place; and instead would use that same logic to callinsert()orupdate()ourselves.it seems better to add a new method for it
Yes, that could also create the consistency I'm talking about. How would we feel about "
\System\Model::getSavedID()" that does the differential logic I describe above for the controller?Reacted by maniabaYes, in cases where multiple insertions and updates are performed across related tables, a method like getSavedID() is definitely necessary.
PHP Version
8.2, 8.3
CodeIgniter4 Version
latest
CodeIgniter4 Installation Method
Composer (using
codeigniter4/appstarter)Which operating systems have you tested for this bug?
macOS, Linux
Which server did you use?
fpm-fcgi
Database
MaraiaDB
What happened?
Not exactly a bug, but not really a FR either. See this forum thread: https://forum.codeigniter.com/showthread.php?tid=91800&pid=421782#pid421782
Essentially I'm offering to PR a change to
\System\Model::update()that would set an instance's$insertIDproperty the same way\System\Model::insert()does so that the behaviour ofsave()is more consistent.Currently
\System\Model::getInsertID()only returns a value if asave()does an insert. The logic needed to handle that works against the elegance provided bysave().Steps to Reproduce
Use
\System\Model::save()Expected Output
Best case,
\System\Model::getInsertID()will return the "affected ID" after\System\Model::save()regardless of which action occurred.Anything else?
I'm stoked contribute to core, but I didn't want to spend the time on a PR if there is no desire to change this behaviour. Please advise.
I can write the update to the docs too if I'm pointed in the right direction to do so.