Repository navigation
Only recommend validated driverless PPDs - #474
Merged
Merged
Conversation
SinghCod3r
force-pushed
the
fix-validated-driverless-ppd-catalog
branch
from
September 29, 2026 05:38
c07a760 to
273ef25
Compare
SinghCod3r
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 1, 2026 10:18
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
CUPS can return
driverless:PPDs for printers that advertise driverless support through DNS-SD, even when generating the driverless PPD for that printer actually fails.This change prevents those unvalidated driverless PPDs from being offered as drivers.
What changed
driverlessanddriverless-faxPPDs from the CUPS PPD catalog.Testing
Tested with the Xerox B235 simulator:
Automated tests:
pytest -q test_newprinter.py— 65 passedpython3 -m py_compile newprinter.py— passedgit diff --check— passed