Skip to content

An odd 'code list' on Rainbow #1

Open

Description

@PeterParslow

Looking at revising ISO 19115-1:2014, I have listed the code lists & enumerations. Comparing my list (extracted from the document / UML) with the list at https://def.isotc211.org/#persistent-identifiers, I find an oddity:

Keyword Type Code - Bio | https://def.isotc211.org/19115/-1/2014/ExampleOfExtendedMatadata/code/KeywordTypeCode-Bio

Activity

  1. nicholascar commented on Feb 28, 2026

    @nicholascar
    Contributor

    Yes, that is a strange one. I inherited it in the old RDF files from Jean B.: https://github.com/ISO-TC211/GOM/blob/master/isotc211_GOM_harmonizedOntology/iso19115/-1/2018/ExampleOfExtendedMatadata.rdf

    It's still stumbled into publication like a zombie at https://def.isotc211.org/common/KeywordTypeCode-Bio but if you don't think it's real, I can kill it.

    I think it's just an example, as the file says, but I didn't want to look hard into content so I just auto-created it but more than happy to kill it!

  2. PeterParslow commented on Jul 10, 2026

    @PeterParslow
    Author

    I can confirm it doesn't exist in the published ISO 19115-1:2014 document nor in the published GML codelists.
    I can imagine it existed in some draft of ISO 19115-1 as a potential example, but didn't make it to the published "Example of Extended Metadata" in D.4

    ISO 19115-1:2014 Annex D is itself an oddity - labelled as a normative annex but consisting entirely of examples!

    I'd also draw your attention to another oddity in the URL that I initially reported "Matadata" - there in the link you shared as inherited!

    I would support quietly disposing of it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions