Skip to content

Use of word "equivalence" in backward #3

Open
Open
Use of word "equivalence" in backward#3
Labels
bugSomething isn't working

Description

@muthissar
muthissar
opened on Sep 5, 2018

In https://github.com/DeepLearningDTU/02456-deep-learning-with-PyTorch/blob/master/1_Feedforward/1.2-automatic-differentiation.ipynb?short_path=5da64dc#L179, it says that the two statements are equivalent, however you cannot switch the two and run out.backward(torch.Tensor([1.0])).

Activity

  1. Faur commented on Sep 9, 2018

    @Faur
    Faur
    on Sep 9, 2018
    Member

    This has probably been changed in a more recent version of PyTorch. We will have a look, thank you.

  2. Faur
    added
    bugSomething isn't working
    on Sep 9, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions